This electronic supplement contains MATLAB code to compute simple proxies for the response of engineering systems and four tables of ground-motion records and simulations selected to have comparable response spectra.
Download: MATLAB Functions [Zip Archive; 20 KB].
The zipped file contains MATLAB functions to compute simple proxies for the response of engineered systems. It consists of the following files:
The following tables list the ground motion recordings (Table S1, from Baker et al., 2011) and simulations selected to have comparable response spectra (Tables S2–S4). All simulations are from the Southern California Earthquake Center Broadband Platform validation exercise (Dreger et al., 2014) of the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake using the stochastic finite fault (EXSIM), Graves–Pitarka hybrid broadband (GP), or composite source model (CSM) method.
Table S1. Set of Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER) ground-motion recordings (set 2 from Baker et al., 2011). RSN refers to record sequence number in the NGA database.
Table S2. EXSIM simulations selected from multiple realizations of the Loma Prieta earthquake that have similar response spectra to the PEER records in Table S1.
Table S3. GP simulations selected from multiple realizations of the Loma Prieta earthquake that have similar response spectra to the PEER records in Table S1.
Table S4. CSM simulations selected from multiple realizations of the Loma Prieta earthquake that have similar response spectra to the PEER records in Table S1.
Baker, J. W. (2007). Quantitative classification of near-fault ground motions using wavelet analysis. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 97, no. 5, 1486–1501.
Baker, J. W., and N. Jayaram (2008). Correlation of spectral acceleration values from NGA ground motion models. Earthq. Spectra 24, no. 1, 299–317.
Baker, J. W., T. Lin, S. K. Shahi, and N. Jayaram (2011). New ground motion selection procedures and selected motions for the PEER transportation research program. Technical Report PEER 2011/03, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, California.
Beyer, K., and J. J. Bommer (2006). Relationships between median values and between aleatory variabilities for different definitions of the horizontal component of motion. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 96, no. 4A, 1512–1522.
Bray, J. D., and A. Rodriguez-Marek (2004). Characterization of fdorward-directivity ground motions in the near-fault region. Soil Dynam.Earthq. Eng. 24, no. 11, 815–828.
Dreger, D. S., G. C. Beroza, S. M. Day, C. A. Goulet, T. H. Jordan, P. A. Spudich, and J. P. Stewart (2014). Evaluation of SCEC Broadband Platform phase 1 ground motion simulation results. Technical Report XXX, Southern California Earthquake Center, Los Angeles, California (in press).
Shahi, S. K., and J. W. Baker (2011). An empirically calibrated framework for including the effects of near-fault directivity in probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 101, no. 2, 742–755.
Shahi, S. K., and J. W. Baker (2013). NGA-West2 models for ground-motion directionality. Technical Report PEER 2013/10, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, California.
Tothong, P., and C. A. Cornell (2006). An empirical ground-motion attenuation relation for inelastic spectral displacement. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 96, no. 6, 2146–2164.
[ Back ]